| Situation | Action | |-----------|--------| | Expected command was issued | – normal confirmation. | | Unexpected message appears | Check recent operator commands or automation logs to see who issued the policy change. | | Message repeats frequently without commands | Investigate for possible automation loops or repeated policy refresh requests. | | Accompanied by error messages (e.g., XCPS004E ) | Resolve the error first; XCPS003I alone does not indicate a problem. |
To resolve this issue, administrators typically check the following according to the IBM Support documentation: xcps003i
There are four main pillars where the handshake typically breaks down: | Situation | Action | |-----------|--------| | Expected
/* Process to test file transfer and troubleshoot XCPS003I */ TESTPROC PROCESS SNODE=REMOTE.NODE.NAME RETAIN=NO HOLD=NO | | Accompanied by error messages (e
Assuming that "xcps003i" is a legitimate and well-known term in a particular industry or niche, I'll attempt to create a comprehensive article. Please find the article below:
: The file is already open or locked by another application. Sample Process Script (The "Piece")
Use a basic telnet or ping to ensure the ports defined in the Netmap (usually port 1364 or 1365) are open and listening. Technical Summary Table IBM Connect:Direct Severity Error / Critical (Stops file transfer) Log Location Connect:Direct Statistics File / Workstation Logs Typical Fix Verify credentials or SSL/TLS certificate chain