Scientifically, a Moon only turns "blood" red during a . This happens because of Rayleigh scattering : BLOOD MOON BY JOHN HAGEE
It was the first of a lunar tetrad — four total eclipses in a row, each one spaced six months apart. But that night, nobody was counting. They were just looking up. blood moon 2013
Unlike the "Four Blood Moons" phenomenon that would follow, 2013 offered a singular, solitary spectacle. It was a year defined not by a series, but by a specific, stunning partial lunar eclipse that tested the patience of observers and delivered a masterclass in celestial mechanics. This article revisits the Blood Moon of 2013, exploring the science behind the spectacle, the cultural fervor that surrounded it, and why that specific year remains a pivotal moment for modern amateur astronomy. Scientifically, a Moon only turns "blood" red during a
If you missed the 2013 event, you can prepare for the next tetrad. The 2013 sequence taught us a few lessons for viewing: They were just looking up
Their theory, rooted in biblical literalism (specifically Joel 2:31 and Acts 2:20), suggested that a tetrad of lunar eclipses falling on specific Jewish feast days (Passover and Tabernacles) heralded a "world-changing event." The 2013 eclipse coincided with the first night of Passover.
They predicted that a "tetrad"—a series of four consecutive total lunar eclipses—starting in April 2014 would coincide with Jewish holidays and signal world-shaking events involving Israel. The Buzz: John Hagee released his influential book, Four Blood Moons: Something Is About to Change